Lehallel
Authorizing approved playback

Torah · 35:33

Yerushalmi Chagigah 07

15 views · Jun 21, 2026

Rabbi Yosef Gavriel Bechhofer

Ask this shiur

Ask in your own words — the answer is the exact moment this shiur speaks to it.

What’s said in this shiur

The opening of this shiur, in Rabbi Yosef Gavriel Bechhofer’s own words — taken from the captions, so names and Hebrew terms may be approximate.

I'd be happy if you would show me the message of Hagiga. And I start from the bottom of Vov on base and the Rashi over here I'm over here Bar Bar. Last time we learned on um yesterday's block. Um just want to quote the possuk which I did not quote and should have quoted at the time. And that is in the Vilna on daf uh uh Vov Amud base. Uh it's the beginning of the line which is right opposite the beginning of the plain Mosha of Halacha Ches. Which is Which is whoever likes the top. So the possuk itself says in Yermiyahu uh tet tet tes tes zayin yud vov. For Machar lem asher azvu v'lo shameru osi v'lo shameru es kol chekiv acherim. Ki avdu es Hashem v'lo osi azvu. Es torasi lo shameru. So the point of this memra is that osi azvu es torasi lo shameru are two things in the possuk. Sounds like they're be Had they only left me and kept the Torah may have been okay. But because osi azvu es torasi lo But because osi azvu es torasi lo shameru. Right? The es torasi lo shameru. So therefore that's why the negative things happened. And that's why uh um that's why that's what Rabbi Akiva Bar Bar is picking up. Rabbi Akiva Bar osi azvu avatola. It would have been would have been okay but Machar lem. Same as torasi lo shameru had they kept my Torah. She'll azvu osi but torasi shameru had they left me but kept my Torah. Okay kept my Torah. I got to go into much beer change of gears which I mentioned yesterday. She'll osi the bar I am a common citizen or in total would have brought them back

Jump to a moment

  1. 0:00I'd be happy if you would show me the message of Hagiga. And I start from
  2. 3:36the the people don't have to go to the uh to the to the um to
  3. 7:15little sister ask about no there was no we also involved in it that's why we
  4. 10:50Shulchan Aruch and Shulchan Aruch Beis Yosef. So, they are not the lots of things which
  5. 14:21So government says a per contra between came a matter that of course is the ones
  6. 17:56right? They need to know what a passover is I wrote this is a we we
  7. 21:31as Dr. Yaki obviously Yaki Moka and on some him and on blood stains from here.
  8. 25:05everything. What I'm saying is suitable for one thing. What I'm saying is suitable for everything.
  9. 28:37he uh was advised him Elazar whether he was the Nasi or the Nasi Nasi wrote
  10. 32:17The shamati is a big busha. I was saying that this one is that it's the

Every second of this shiur plays inside Lehallel — a filtered YouTube library where each video was reviewed against one written standard before it could appear. No ads, no comments, no autoplay into anything unapproved.

More from Rabbi Yosef Gavriel Bechhoferevery one approved
Why is this here?

Before this shiur could appear, it was reviewed against one written standard — the same standard for every video in the library, no exceptions and no algorithm deciding on its own. It is listed under Torah. If you believe something here does not belong, tell us — every challenge is read by a person.

Get the week’s best, by email

One email a week — a handful of approved shiurim and music. No account needed.

Know a family who would use this? Give a Lehallel membership.