Lehallel
Authorizing approved playback

Torah · 25:21

Amud Yomi Masechet Shekalim Daf 5A

4 views · Mar 10, 2026

Rabbi Dovid Hofstedter

Ask this shiur

Ask in your own words — the answer is the exact moment this shiur speaks to it.

What’s said in this shiur

The opening of this shiur, in Rabbi Dovid Hofstedter’s own words — taken from the captions, so names and Hebrew terms may be approximate.

D Of right at top of the om the end of the top line. We learned previously about the relationship between messer behemma and the kalban that they're inversely related that when there is a of messer beha meaning it's not considered a partnership then we say there's no of when there is of meaning when we say that it's a partnership then there's no that it's a partnership then there's no so therefore if two brothers for instance inherited state from the father if they did not divide up the state so it's considered to be all one it's considered to be still the state is in intact the over there in such a case in that case over there there's no of of the kala but there is a of but if they divide up this state and then they join together again so then they're considered to be partners they're partners apart from partners they're partners apart from behema but there's common but sometimes we say that they're pur from both and sometimes they're being from both. So how is that? So what is the case? What are the scenarios that you could be potter both in both if they divided up the rest of the assets of the estate but not the behemoths. So the rest of the assets were divided and then when they rejoined were divided and then when they rejoined together so that's considered to be a in such a case a partnership if it's a partnership then the but they did divide up the payment so therefore as far as the behem is concerned the estate is intact and therefore it's nothing has changed they're not considered a partnership in regards to the behemoth there's a of mess beh they divided up the rest of the assets. So from the money they divided it up and then they've joined together. Well then

Jump to a moment

  1. 0:10D Of right at top of the om the end of the top line. We learned
  2. 2:11then they've joined together. Well then now they're considered to be as far as that concerned
  3. 4:44that if the behemoths are not the right but if most of the assets are the
  4. 7:23their behalf there should be no but we learned in the Mishna however in such a
  5. 9:58as used to buy sheets of gold and which are used for to plate the kadoshim
  6. 12:32different shifyers the reason was called these boxes are called shyers because it was narrow on
  7. 15:07now we'll see there's a when they retire it was it for the purpose of just
  8. 17:42not convert it into something even easier, more valuable and easier to to transport it? Convert
  9. 20:22make a shame makes Yeshua either to the Gizbar or to the town's people this and
  10. 22:57so we learned in the Mishna that the people of the city they If God lost

Every second of this shiur plays inside Lehallel — a filtered YouTube library where each video was reviewed against one written standard before it could appear. No ads, no comments, no autoplay into anything unapproved.

More from Rabbi Dovid Hofstedterevery one approved
Why is this here?

Before this shiur could appear, it was reviewed against one written standard — the same standard for every video in the library, no exceptions and no algorithm deciding on its own. It is listed under Torah. If you believe something here does not belong, tell us — every challenge is read by a person.

Get the week’s best, by email

One email a week — a handful of approved shiurim and music. No account needed.

Know a family who would use this? Give a Lehallel membership.